Sayer Ji
Founder of GreenMedInfo.com

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & get Nature's Evidence-Based Pharmacy

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Download Now

500+ pages of Natural Medicine Alternatives and Information.

n/a
Article Publish Status: FREE
Abstract Title:

Association of Breastfeeding and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption with Obesity Prevalence in Offspring Born to Mothers with and Without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (P11-098-19).

Abstract Source:

Curr Dev Nutr. 2019 Jun ;3(Suppl 1). Epub 2019 Jun 13. PMID: 31225178

Abstract Author(s):

Sarvenaz Vandyousefi, Shannon Whaley, Fiona Asigbee, Matthew Landry, Reem Ghaddar, Jaimie Davis

Article Affiliation:

Sarvenaz Vandyousefi

Abstract:

Objectives: Prenatal and early life factors such as Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), and early exposure to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) may contribute to obesity in children. The relationship of EBF and SSBs with obesity prevalence in children exposed to GDM has rarely been evaluated. This study examined the association of EBF and early SSBs consumption with obesity prevalence in children (1-5y) born to mothers with and without GDM.

Methods: This study used data from the 2014 Los Angeles County Women, Infants, and Children(WIC) Survey, which included 3,707 mothers and their children (1-5y). Infants (1-2y) with weight-for-height ≥ 97.7percentile were classified as subjects with high weight-for-length and children (2-5y) were classified as subjects with obesity if their BMI-for-age was ≥ 95percentile.

Results: The individual and combination interaction effects of GDM, SSBs intake, and EBF on obesity prevalence were all significant ( < 0.05). Compared to GDM offspring, with low SSBs intake, and who were EBF (referent), those who were GDM, with high SSBs intake and who were EBF had approximately a five-fold increase in odds of obesity (OR = 4.77, 95%CI 1.55-8.60, = 0.03). Compared to the GDM referent group, GDM offspring who were not EBF with low and high SSBs intake had 4.3- and 4.4-times higher odds of obesity, respectively (OR = 4.33, 95%CI 1.42- 8.07, = 0.01; OR = 4.38, 95%CI 1.39- 8.16, = 0.01). Using non-GDM, EBF and low SSBs as referent, those who were not EBF, with either high or low SSBs had approximately a 4-fold increase in odds of obesity (OR = 3.62, 95%CI: 2.16-6.05, < 0.0001; OR = 3.83, 95%CI: 2.26-6.48, < 0.0001).Compared to the non-GDM referent group, those who were EBF and had high SSBs intake had 77% higher odds of obesity (OR = 1.77, 95%CI 0.93-3.37, = 0.001).

Conclusions: In non-GDM offspring, EBF was protective against odds of obesity in both high and low SSBs consumers. In GDM offspring, EBF was only protective against obesity when SSBs intake was low. Surprisingly, GDM offspring who were EBF and had high SSBs consumption had a 4- to 5-fold increase in odds of obesity compared to those not EBF with either low or high SSBs intake. These results suggest that interventions should focus on the combined protective effects of EBF and low SSBs intake, particularly in GDM offspring.

Funding Sources: First 5 LA.

Print Options


Key Research Topics

Sayer Ji
Founder of GreenMedInfo.com

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & get Nature's Evidence-Based Pharmacy

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Download Now

500+ pages of Natural Medicine Alternatives and Information.

This website is for information purposes only. By providing the information contained herein we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any type of disease or medical condition. Before beginning any type of natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.

© Copyright 2008-2019 GreenMedInfo.com, Journal Articles copyright of original owners, MeSH copyright NLM.